EDIH, EEN, Interreg: the platform for European programmes.Find out more

Digital Transformation Maturity for Enterprises · Holistic Approach (MIT)

Your digital transformation measured theme by theme, and converted into a prioritised roadmap.

10 themes, a 5-level scale. And the action that moves each level to the next.

The framework’s 10 themes, already written from L1 to L5. One company, one business unit, or 300 at once.

Digital Transformation Maturity for Enterprises · Holistic Approach (MIT)

Digital vision and ambitionN1 → N5
Value proposition and digital offeringsN1 → N5
Customer experience and journeysN1 → N5
Operational excellence and automationN1 → N5

10 themes, 5-level scale.

Nordhavn Industries

53 / 100

Digital vision and ambition6484
Value proposition and digital offerings5379
Customer experience and journeys6182
Operational excellence and automation3773
IAIndustrialised: your interview notes are enough, the AI fills in the audit.

They measure their maturity with Datamensio

  • CNES
  • Docaposte
  • ANITI
  • Pôle SCS
  • Cetim
  • Cap'Tronic

An example

This could be your situation.

Take one company as an example: three sites, three spreadsheets, no shared answer.

01

Nobody can consolidate.

Nordhavn Industries, 2,400 people in Hamburg, Lyon and Porto. A client asks where the group stands. Each site answers in its own spreadsheet, with its own scales.

02

Three weeks, a single base.

One Digital maturity framework inspired by MIT CISR / MIT Sloan, holistic approach with over 100 audit points assessment launched across all three sites at once, from the managers’ interview notes. The framework was already written, its 10 themes and levels L1 to L5 too.

03

Two costs avoided before being committed.

A score of 53 out of 100, with the gap concentrated on three themes. The AI companion spotted that two actions duplicated those of another audit. The committee report took one sentence to request.

What it saved them

  • 3sites measured on the same base, instead of three questionnaires to reconcile
  • 2duplicate actions caught before the spend
  • 1committee report, with no manual rework

These figures are an example. They could be yours.

The standard imposes processes. Datamensio says where you stand.

01

The framework is already written

Themes, questions and levels L1 to L5, all written. You do not start from an empty spreadsheet.

02

The score lands the same day

Online, by self-assessment link or in interview. Theme by theme, comparable over time.

03

The gap becomes a costed plan

Every step up carries its action. The AI prioritises on expected effect, not on the order of the standard.

04

Progress can be demonstrated

Campaign after campaign, against your target and against your own past. That is what your board asks for.

The maturity scale

One level, the next, and the action that links the two.

It is this mechanism (a level, a level above, and the action that links the two) that turns an observation into a trajectory.

Are digital initiatives subject to value measurement after they go live?

  1. N1

    No measurement after go-live. The success of an initiative is conflated with its delivery.

  2. N2

    A few initiatives are reviewed, at the initiative of their sponsor, with no common format or deadline.

  3. N3

    Every initiative carries business indicators defined at scoping stage, measured after go-live in a shared format.

  4. N4

    The measurements feed the portfolio review: initiatives with no observed effect are redirected or stopped, with the decision recorded.

  5. N5

    Lessons from the measurements change the selection criteria for subsequent initiatives, and this revision is documented from one cycle to the next.

Action to move from L2 to L3

Require two business indicators and their measurement date in the scoping document, then place the review of these readings on the agenda of the digital steering committee for the quarter following go-live.

« With Datamensio, we meet our objectives far more efficiently. The ERDF inspection services and our supervising ministry particularly appreciated an approach that gives them reliable data. »
Chambre de commerce et d'industrie

Director, CCI 94CCI Île-de-France

« We believe this is the most suitable solution to scale our transformation project and measure impact according to our needs. »
Interreg Danube Region

Maja SucekChief Operating Officer, Interreg Danube

Take your first measurement

What this framework covers

The holistic approach to digital transformation, popularised by research from the MIT Center for Information Systems Research, refuses to reduce the subject to technology. It jointly assesses the digital value proposition, customer experience, operational efficiency, data architecture, internal skills, operating model and investment governance. The framework breaks this model down into more than one hundred observable audit points: not declared intentions, but practices that can be observed, dated and assigned to an owner. It is this granularity that makes the result usable in a steering committee.

In practice, digital transformation is difficult to manage because it has no single owner. Marketing pushes forward on journeys, IT on the platform, operations on automation, and no one holds the consolidated view. The questions that keep coming up are concrete. Have the digital initiatives launched over the past two years changed a business indicator, or only delivered a tool? Is the data produced by one channel reusable by another, or does each team rebuild its own customer repository? Are digital skills held in house, or dependent on suppliers renewed without any transfer.

One confusion deserves to be cleared up: digitisation is not transformation. Digitising an existing process improves a unit cost. Transforming means changing what the business sells, how it serves it, and how it decides. Many organisations display a well-stocked portfolio of initiatives while staying at the same maturity level, because those initiatives share neither a data foundation, nor an operating model, nor a decision rule. The arrival of generative AI widens the gap: it creates value where data and processes are already structured, and little elsewhere.

A progress dashboard answers a tracking question: are the projects being delivered on time. The maturity assessment answers a positioning question: what level of mastery has each capability reached, and what specific action moves it to the next level. That is the difference between noting that a programme is spending its budget and knowing what it durably puts in place. Each gap between the score achieved and the chosen target becomes a line in the action plan, with a cost, a timeframe and an expected effect on the score.

Within Datamensio, the framework is ready to use and remains adaptable. AI adjusts the themes, rephrases the questions in your sector’s vocabulary and refines the levels using the CMMI method. It can also build a variant from your own documents: master plan, programme roadmap, scoping notes. You remain the owner of the resulting framework.

Reference standard: Digital maturity framework inspired by MIT CISR / MIT Sloan, holistic approach with over 100 audit points

The themes assessed

  • Digital vision and ambition

    Formalisation of the ambition, alignment with corporate strategy, chosen horizon, ownership by the executive committee, internal communication.

  • Value proposition and digital offerings

    Share of revenue from digital offerings, services attached to products, pricing, capacity to trial new offerings.

  • Customer experience and journeys

    Knowledge of actual journeys, continuity across channels, personalisation, satisfaction measurement, feedback loop to product teams.

  • Operational excellence and automation

    End-to-end digitised processes, automation of repetitive tasks, exception handling, process performance indicators.

  • Data foundation and exploitation

    Shared repositories, data quality and freshness, accessibility for business teams, governance, analytics and AI use cases in production.

  • Architecture and technology platforms

    Modularity of the information system, application interfaces, technical debt, cloud strategy, ability to integrate a new component without a heavy project.

  • Skills and digital culture

    Skills mapping, upskilling plan, recruitment, dependence on suppliers, room for experimentation and the right to fail.

  • Operating model and organisation

    Cross-functional teams, product owner roles, alignment between business and IT, iterative ways of working, associated change management.

  • Digital investment governance

    Arbitration body, selection criteria, funding cycle, portfolio review, ability to stop an initiative.

  • Value measurement and steering

    Business indicators attached to initiatives, post-launch measurement, comparison between entities, tracking maturity over time.

A short version of the framework is available for the online self-assessment.

Frequently asked questions

Does this framework lead to certification?

No, and it is not suited to that. Digital transformation has no certifying body. The assessment measures a maturity level per theme and produces a roadmap. Its value is internal: arbitrating, prioritising, tracking progress from one cycle to the next.

How does it differ from a programme tracking dashboard?

The dashboard tracks the progress of projects already decided. The assessment maps the organisation’s capabilities and shows which ones are holding back the others. It comes in upstream, to decide what to launch, and downstream, to check what the programme has actually put in place.

How long does the assessment take?

The short version takes around thirty minutes per respondent to complete. The full version, run collaboratively with contributors from the business, IT and data teams, generally spans one to two weeks. Most of the time goes into gathering information, not entering it.

Can the framework be adapted to our sector?

Yes. The themes, questions and levels can all be changed. AI rephrases the framework in your industry’s vocabulary, or builds a variant from your master plan and scoping notes. You own the resulting framework.

Can several business units be compared with one another?

Yes. The same framework can be rolled out to several entities, with a score per theme and a comparison between entities as well as against previous assessments. A cross-cutting roadmap then consolidates the action plans that overlap.

Do respondents need a technical background?

No. The questions cover governance, organisational and usage practices, not configurations. A few points relating to architecture or data require a technical contact: the collaborative mode allows those questions to be assigned to them directly.

How do you get from the score to a budget?

Each gap between the score and the target generates a line in the action plan. The service catalogue opens up a solution against each line, with its cost, timeframe and expected effect on the score. The roadmap is thus costed line by line.

Where is the data hosted?

In France, with OVH, with backup at Scaleway. No transfer outside the European Union. The AI models used can be selected, including from European providers.

Take your first measurement