EDIH, EEN, Interreg: the platform for European programmes.Find out more

Maturity Regulation (EU) 2016/429 · Animal health law compliance

Your animal health practices, measured against Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and turned into a costed action plan.

10 themes, a 5-level scale. And the action that moves each level to the next.

The framework’s 10 themes, already written from L1 to L5. One company, one business unit, or 300 at once.

Maturity Regulation (EU) 2016/429 · Animal health law compliance

Operator responsibility and health governanceN1 → N5
Establishment registration and approvalN1 → N5
BiosecurityN1 → N5
Animal identification and traceabilityN1 → N5

10 themes, 5-level scale.

Nordhavn Industries

53 / 100

Operator responsibility and health governance6484
Establishment registration and approval5379
Biosecurity6182
Animal identification and traceability3773
IAIndustrialised: your interview notes are enough, the AI fills in the audit.

They measure their maturity with Datamensio

  • Agri Sud-Ouest Innovation
  • ODA
  • Chambre de commerce et d'industrie
  • Eurobiomed
  • Enterprise Europe Network
  • HGK, Chambre de commerce croate

An example

This could be your situation.

Take one company as an example: three sites, three spreadsheets, no shared answer.

01

Nobody can consolidate.

Nordhavn Industries, 2,400 people in Hamburg, Lyon and Porto. A client asks where the group stands. Each site answers in its own spreadsheet, with its own scales.

02

Three weeks, a single base.

One Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Animal Health Law), applicable since 21 April 2021 assessment launched across all three sites at once, from the managers’ interview notes. The framework was already written, its 10 themes and levels L1 to L5 too.

03

Two costs avoided before being committed.

A score of 53 out of 100, with the gap concentrated on three themes. The AI companion spotted that two actions duplicated those of another audit. The committee report took one sentence to request.

What it saved them

  • 3sites measured on the same base, instead of three questionnaires to reconcile
  • 2duplicate actions caught before the spend
  • 1committee report, with no manual rework

These figures are an example. They could be yours.

The standard imposes processes. Datamensio says where you stand.

01

The framework is already written

Themes, questions and levels L1 to L5, all written. You do not start from an empty spreadsheet.

02

The score lands the same day

Online, by self-assessment link or in interview. Theme by theme, comparable over time.

03

The gap becomes a costed plan

Every step up carries its action. The AI prioritises on expected effect, not on the order of the standard.

04

Progress can be demonstrated

Campaign after campaign, against your target and against your own past. That is what your board asks for.

The maturity scale

One level, the next, and the action that links the two.

It is this mechanism (a level, a level above, and the action linking the two) that turns a finding into a trajectory.

Is the notification route for a suspected listed disease defined and operational at all times?

  1. N1

    No written route. When a suspicion arises, whoever is on site improvises and tries to find someone to contact.

  2. N2

    A procedure exists and mentions the competent authority, but only a few people know it and it does not cover weekends or absences.

  3. N3

    The procedure is distributed across all sites, with suspicion criteria, contacts and timeframes. On-call cover is in place. Past notifications are logged.

  4. N4

    The route is tested, notification timeframes are measured, immediate precautionary measures are described by species and applied without waiting for official instructions.

  5. N5

    The system is reviewed after every exercise, lesson learnt or update to the disease lists, with documented tracking of revisions and resulting actions.

Action to move from L2 to L3

Formalise a notification sheet for each site setting out suspicion criteria, the competent authority contact, the referring veterinarian and the on-call backup, display it in technical premises, present it at the next team meeting and check awareness of it at the following animal health visit.

« With Datamensio, we meet our objectives far more efficiently. The ERDF inspection services and our supervising ministry particularly appreciated an approach that gives them reliable data. »
Chambre de commerce et d'industrie

Director, CCI 94CCI Île-de-France

« We believe this is the most suitable solution to scale our transformation project and measure impact according to our needs. »
Interreg Danube Region

Maja SucekChief Operating Officer, Interreg Danube

Take your first measurement

What this framework covers

Regulation (EU) 2016/429, known as the Animal Health Law, has applied since 21 April 2021 and replaces around forty earlier acts. It sets a single framework: operator responsibility for biosecurity, registration or approval of establishments keeping terrestrial and aquatic animals, identification and traceability, mandatory notification of suspected cases, animal health visits, movement and certification rules, and disease control measures. Disease lists and their categories A to E are set out in Regulation (EU) 2018/1882, with detailed provisions across numerous delegated and implementing acts.

In practice, the difficulty is not knowing the text, it is knowing where the organisation actually stands, site by site. Are biosecurity plans written for inspection purposes or genuinely applied at vehicle, personnel and animal entry points? Are holding and movement registers kept up to date daily, or reconstructed just before a visit? Does a suspicion detected on a Friday evening follow a notification route known to whoever is on site? These questions play out differently in every establishment within a single group.

One common confusion is worth clearing up: the Animal Health Law does not replace food hygiene rules, and it is not limited to livestock farms. It also covers hatcheries, assembly centres, transporters, aquaculture establishments and germinal product operators. In addition, individual traceability and registration in national databases fall under this framework, not under Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, which deals with the traceability of food and feed.

A compliance audit concludes with a gap or a pass, at a given date, on a given site. The maturity assessment answers a different question: what level of control do the practices actually reach, and what concrete action moves them to the next level. On a subject where the same requirement applies across dozens of establishments, this progressive reading makes it possible to compare business units, identify those dragging the score down, and allocate resources where they have the fastest effect.

Within Datamensio, the framework is ready to use and adaptable. The AI adjusts themes, questions and level wording to your sector, terrestrial or aquaculture, or builds a variant from your biosecurity plans, procedures and inspection reports. Assessments run across multiple sites feed into a consolidated roadmap, prioritised by the AI according to score impact and the cost of actions.

Reference standard: Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Animal Health Law), applicable since 21 April 2021

The themes assessed

  • Operator responsibility and health governance

    Allocation of animal health responsibilities, awareness of obligations among relevant staff, training, coordination with the veterinarian, resources allocated.

  • Establishment registration and approval

    Mapping of establishments subject to registration or approval, files submitted, approval conditions maintained over time, information updates sent to the authority.

  • Biosecurity

    Formalised biosecurity plan, control of people, vehicle and animal entry and exit, sectorisation, cleaning and disinfection, quarantine, pest and carcass management.

  • Animal identification and traceability

    Individual or batch identification depending on species, holding register maintenance, declaration to national databases, registration timeframes, inventory consistency.

  • Surveillance and animal health visits

    Surveillance programme, frequency and content of visits, self-checks, monitoring of health and mortality indicators, use of laboratory results.

  • Notification of listed diseases

    Awareness of applicable category A to E diseases, suspicion criteria, notification route and timeframes to the competent authority, conduct pending instructions, traceability of reports.

  • Movement, transport and certification

    Conditions applicable to national and intra-Union movements, animal health documents and certificates, prior notification via the official system, assembly centres, cleaning of means of transport.

  • Germinal products and aquatic animals

    Rules specific to germinal products, aquaculture establishments, health status and affected zones, conditions for introduction and removal.

  • Outbreak preparedness and management

    Response plan in the event of suspicion or confirmation, restriction measures, depopulation and disposal, simulation exercises, coordination with official services.

  • Documentation, review and improvement

    Archiving and availability of registers, follow-up on inspection findings, corrective actions and verification of their effectiveness, periodic review of the system.

A short version of the framework is available for the online self-assessment.

Frequently asked questions

Can Regulation (EU) 2016/429 be certified?

No. It is a directly applicable EU regulation, checked by the competent authorities of the member states, with establishments registered or approved as relevant. The assessment measures the maturity of your practices and prepares for these checks, it does not grant any approval or certificate.

How is this different from a compliance audit?

An audit rules on one site at one date: pass or gap. The assessment places each practice on a maturity scale and points to the action that moves it up a level. The two complement each other, with the assessment used to prepare for and prioritise the audit.

How long does the assessment take?

The short version can be completed in 20 to 30 minutes by a manager familiar with the site. The full version, run collaboratively with the veterinarian, production and quality teams, generally takes one to two weeks, with most of the time spent gathering registers and evidence.

Does the framework cover aquatic as well as terrestrial animals?

Yes. The common core of the regulation applies to both, and specific themes distinguish the obligations for aquaculture establishments and germinal products. The AI can narrow the framework to your sector to avoid irrelevant questions.

Can the framework be adapted to our organisation?

Yes. Questions, levels and themes can be modified, and you can add your own internal requirements or those of your customers. The AI can also build a variant from your biosecurity plans and inspection reports. The framework belongs to you.

How can several farms or sites be compared?

Each site is assessed against the same framework, which makes scores comparable by theme. The benchmark ranks each business unit against the others and against its own past assessments. A cross-site roadmap consolidates shared actions instead of duplicating them site by site.

How does this assessment fit with hygiene rules and official controls?

Regulations (EC) No 852/2004 and 853/2004 deal with food, and Regulation (EU) 2017/625 governs official controls. The corresponding assessments are cross-referenced with the animal health one in a single roadmap, without repeating the same actions across several plans.

Where is the data hosted?

In France, with OVH, backed up with Scaleway. No transfer outside the European Union. The AI models used can be selected, including from European providers.

Take your first measurement